ArticleClinical and translational science2026
Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Drug-Induced QTc Changes in a Large Finnish Biobank Cohort.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prolongation of the QT interval is a known precursor to serious arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death, often triggered by medication use. Current medication risk evaluation platforms rely on literature-based synthesis and may lag behind real-world developments. We aimed to evaluate whether a machine learning (ML) model trained on real-world genomic and medication data can identify associations between drug use and QTc duration, potentially enabling automated risk detection in clinical workflows. We included 10,208 individuals from the FinnGen biobank Expansion Area 3 substudy, integrating prescription records, clinical variables, and genetic information. We applied a nested-cross-validation approach to develop an ML framework to predict QTc duration using clinical characteristics, recent medication purchases, and polygenic score for QTc duration. We performed conventional linear regression analyses to estimate the robustness of the findings. Only a minority of ML-detected drug-QTc associations aligned with known effects listed in expert-curated reference. Several apparent false positives were observed, and effect sizes for true positives, such as amiodarone, were small and likely interpreted as clinically not meaningful (+1 ms in ML vs. +49 ms in linear regression). These findings highlight challenges in using ML to detect meaningful drug effects on ECG. ML models did not reliably identify medications associated with QT-interval prolongation. Consequently, risk quantification using QTc as an intermediate marker of electrophysiological vulnerability was limited in this framework. While new approaches continue to develop in medication safety assessment, a systematic evidence review conducted by clinical pharmacology experts is unlikely to be supplanted in the foreseeable future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.