ArticleJournal of clinical ultrasound : JCU2026
Cardiac POCUS in Undifferentiated Shock Revealing Aortic Dissection.
Article in Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute aortic dissection is a medical emergency requiring prompt diagnosis and intervention. Mortality in untreated Stanford type A dissection increases approximately 2.6% per hour during the first 24 h and may reach 47%-55% within 24-48 h. In critically ill patients, point-of-care ultrasound has emerged as a valuable bedside tool, particularly when conventional imaging is delayed or contraindicated. We describe the case of a 43-year-old man with Marfan syndrome, prior ascending aortic replacement with a Dacron graft (without aortic valve replacement), intellectual disability, psychiatric disorders, hypertension, dyslipidemia, hypothyroidism, and a known descending aortic aneurysm. He was transferred from a rehabilitation center to the intensive care unit due to hypotension. A non-contrast thoracic CT scan had been performed in the emergency department prior to ICU admission because of a documented severe allergy to iodinated contrast media. Upon ICU arrival, he was in shock and required mechanical ventilation and vasopressor support. Parasternal windows were not interpretable due to poor acoustic quality; suprasternal and abdominal aortic views were attempted but not feasible. However, apical five- and three-chamber transthoracic views revealed a markedly dilated ascending aorta and a mobile thin intimal flap distal to the aortic valve. Color Doppler demonstrated differential flow patterns consistent with true and false lumens and moderate-to-severe aortic regurgitation. These findings were highly suggestive of Stanford type A aortic dissection. Given the unequivocal transthoracic findings, transesophageal echocardiography was not performed in order to avoid further delay, and the patient was urgently transferred to a cardiac surgery center for definitive management. Clinical outcome after transfer remains unknown. This case highlights the diagnostic value of focused cardiac ultrasound in critically ill patients and underscores the importance of systematically assessing the proximal ascending aorta when evaluating shock, even in patients with previous aortic surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.