Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42083063›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2026

Diversity of self-construal and behavioral motivation system in Indonesia: a comparative study in Torajan and Makassarese communities in South Sulawesi.

Triana Istiqlal, Andi Agus Mumang, Kristian Liaury, Andi Jayalangkara Tanra, Yukiko Uchida, Takafumi Ishida, Hana Shimizu-Furusawa, Irawan Yusuf, Takuro Furusawa

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Triana IstiqlalDepartment of Ecology and Environment, Graduate School of Asian and African Area Studies, Kyoto University, Room #AA431, Research Bldg. No. 2, Yoshida-Honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan. trianaistiqlal@unhas.ac.id.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6771-3150
Andi Agus MumangDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Graduate School of Hasanuddin University, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia.
Kristian LiauryDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, Jl. Muhajirin 1 no.23, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia.
Andi Jayalangkara TanraDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, Jl. Muhajirin 1 no.23, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia.
Yukiko UchidaInstitute for the Future of Human Society, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Takafumi IshidaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Hana Shimizu-FurusawaDepartment of Hygiene and Public Health, School of Medicine, Teikyo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Irawan YusufDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia.
Takuro FurusawaDepartment of Ecology and Environment, Graduate School of Asian and African Area Studies, Kyoto University, Room #AA431, Research Bldg. No. 2, Yoshida-Honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan. furusawa@m.u-tokyo.ac.jp.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 16H05828Japan Society for the Promotion of Sciences 16H05828Japan Society for the Promotion of Sciences 19KK0239
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study examined the intra-national diversity in self-construal and behavioral motivation by comparing the Torajan and Makassarese communities in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Although Indonesia is often characterized as collectivistic, local cultural variation may produce distinct psychological profiles.

methodsThis cross-sectional study included 383 adult participants, comprising 179 Torajan and 204 Makassarese adults. Self-construal and behavioral motivation were assessed using the validated Indonesian versions of the Self-Construal Scale (SCS) and BIS/BAS scales (Istiqlal et al. 2022). Group differences were analyzed using independent-samples t-tests and Cohen's d, and multiple linear regression analyses were conducted to explore identify demographic nd sociocultural factors associated with SCS and BIS/BAS scores.

resultsTorajan participants reported higher levels of both independence (+ 0.31, p = 0.002) and interdependence (+ 0.68, p < 0.0001) than Makassarese participants, indicating a dual self-construal pattern. They also showed higher behavioral inhibition (+ 1.23, p < 0.0001) and lower behavioral activation (- 4.97 ~ - 4.87, p < 0.0001). Relatively large effect sizes were observed for BAS-related outcomes. Demographic factors, including age (with SCS interdependence + 0.01, p = 0.025), female (with SCS interdependence - 0.48, p = 0.001), retired/unemployment (with SCS independence - 0.53, p = 0.025), office worker (with BIS - 0.19, p = 0.005), and "other" occupation including rural subsistence (with BIS - 0.99, p = 0.002) were associated with variation in self-construal and motivational measures.

conclusionsThese findings indicate that psychological orientations vary substantially across cultural groups within Indonesia. The results highlight how local cultural contexts and social environments may be associated with differences in self-construal and motivational tendencies. Such insights may inform culturally sensitive approaches in mental health and community-based interventions.

Indexed as

MotivationSelf ConceptAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIndonesiaMaleMiddle AgedSocial GroupYoung AdultBehavioral inhibition systemBehavioral motivationCultural psychologyCultural valuesMakassar IndonesiaSelf-construalTorajaTorajan and Makassarese communities

Identifiers

PMID42083063
PMCPMC13285424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.