ArticleBMC health services research2026
Universal newborn hearing screening outcomes based on national health policy in Chiangrai Prachanukroh Hospital, Thailand.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUniversal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) is essential for early identification of congenital hearing loss to decrease the adverse effects of a child's speech and language development. Since 2021, Thailand has enforced newborn hearing screening, followed by the national health policy of the Ministry of Public Health. In order to meet this objective, the quality of these programs should be monitored using internationally recognized benchmarks. This study aimed to analyze the UNHS outcomes according to the national health policy and standard benchmarks.
methodsA retrospective study was conducted at Chiangrai Prachanukroh Hospital, a tertiary care hospital, from December 2021 to November 2022. All newborns delivered in a one-year period who underwent hearing screening were recruited. The coverage rate, rates of diagnostic hearing evaluation, and hearing rehabilitation were analyzed and compared between the well-baby newborns (WBN) and high-risk newborns (HRN).
resultsOf 4,216 newborns delivered, 3,363 (79.8%) were WBN, and 853 (20.2%) were HRN. The screening coverage rates before 1 month of age were 94.6% and 72.2%, and referral rates were 34.7% and 34.1% for WBN and HRN, respectively, showing significant differences. The follow-up return rates were 51.9% and 45.7%, audiological diagnosis within 3 months of age were 11.8% and 10.5%, considering diagnosis within 6 months of age were 52.7% and 42.1% for WBN and HRN, respectively, showing without significant differences. Eight children were diagnosed with sensorineural hearing loss, three from the WBN group and five from the HRN group. One child, in the high-risk group, received bilateral hearing aids and speech therapy.
conclusionUNHS serves as a critical initial measure for the early identification of hearing loss, paving the way for timely interventions. Despite the preliminary indicators not meeting the standard benchmarks, there is a clear necessity for systematically developing implementation protocols to enhance the program's efficacy. The national health policy in Thailand should persist in its efforts, including providing resources such as manpower, money, and materials (3M's), to ensure the program's success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.