ArticleBMC palliative care2026
Impact of a shared pediatric palliative care program on end-of-life care trends among children: a 10-year retrospective study in Taiwan.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ethical dilemmas and intervention strategies in doctor-patient-family communication in end-of-life pediatric oncology: a narrative review.Translational pediatrics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEarly integration of pediatric palliative care (PPC) improves symptom control, communication, and goal-concordant decision-making. Despite these benefits, PPC remains underutilized in many Asian healthcare systems, where referrals are often delayed and most children die in intensive care units (ICUs).
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included children aged 0-18 years who died between 2008 and 2017 at two medical centers in southern Taiwan (n = 294). A shared PPC program was implemented in 2011, embedding palliative specialists within primary care teams. Documentation of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders, family meetings, PPC consultations, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and place of death were compared across pre-implementation, early post-implementation, and late post-implementation phases.
resultsFollowing implementation, DNR documentation increased from 59.2% to 73.9% (p = .03). Documented family meetings rose from 4.1% to 18.2% (p < .001), and PPC consultations increased from 7.1% to 23.9% (p < .001), suggesting potential improvements in interdisciplinary communication and advance care planning. ICU deaths remained high (87.8%-89.8%), and CPR rates declined but did not reach statistical significance (p = .09). Cancer diagnosis (OR = 7.97, 95% CI 2.71-23.42) and increasing age at diagnosis (OR = 1.12 per year, 95% CI 1.06-1.18) were independently associated with PPC consultation.
conclusionsIntegration of a shared PPC model was associated with improvements in advance care planning and interdisciplinary collaboration. Earlier referral triggers, clinician education, and expansion of community-based PPC services may be important to help reduce high-intensity end-of-life care and better align care delivery with family preferences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.