ArticleBMC public health2026
High workload and its connection to health-related quality of life among in-home care workers in northern Sweden during the Covid-19 pandemic.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe main aim of this study is to investigate the connection between a high workload and health-related quality of life among in-home care workers in northern Sweden during the COVID-19 pandemic. We also investigate whether social support and control at work can prevent poor health due to high workload.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted during the pandemic, with 629 (response rate 33 per cent) of an estimated 1,900 in-home care workers responding. Results were compared with a nearly identical survey conducted prior to the pandemic in which 1,154 (response rate 58 per cent) of an estimated 2000 in-home care workers responded. Psychosocial factors were measured using QPSNordic and health-related quality of life using EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D). EQ-5D responses were translated into quality-adjusted life year (QALY) scores. Propensity scores were used with absolute risk differences.
resultsDuring the pandemic, staff with high workload had a statistically significantly (6.2%) lower QALY score (confidence interval 2.2%-10.3%) compared to staff with a normal workload. This was also the case for the usual activities and the anxiety/depression dimensions of EQ-5D. These risk differences were greater, but not statistically significant, during the pandemic than before. The combination of a normal workload and a high degree of control over one's work appeared to protect against a low QALY score, while social support at work did not seem to be protective.
conclusionsHigh workload is related to poorer health-related quality of life. This is mainly attributable to anxiety/depression. In-home care organisations need to manage workload better to prevent poor health among staff during strained situations such as a pandemic. The results of our study indicate that in-home care organisations should increase their readiness to promote opportunities for staff to maintain a high degree of control over their work, in order to counteract variations in workload that ultimately appear to have a negative impact on HRQoL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.