ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
Interpretable machine learning for postoperative nausea and vomiting prediction in elderly orthopedic patients: a comparative study.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPostoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) prolongs hospitalization and reduces patient satisfaction. Identifying high-risk elderly patients requires accurate absolute risk assessments, yet existing tools often lack probability calibration and transparency.
methodsWe included 1216 elderly patients undergoing elective hip or knee surgery. To strictly prevent data leakage, the dataset was partitioned into training, validation, and independent test sets in a 7:1:2 ratio prior to any imputation or feature selection. Following the systematic hyperparameter optimization of 12 distinct machine learning algorithms, a StackNet meta-model was developed by fusing optimal base-learner probabilities with raw clinical features. Clinical utility was evaluated via Brier scores and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA), alongside SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) interpretability.
resultsOverall PONV incidence was 33%. The StackNet model achieved an AUC of 0.9338, significantly outperforming the conventional Logistic Regression baseline (AUC = 0.7564, p < 0.001) with superior calibration (Brier score = 0.102). On the independent test set, the StackNet model achieved an accuracy of 0.7860, sensitivity of 0.9250, specificity of 0.7178, and AUC of 0.9338, while the Logistic Regression baseline achieved an accuracy of 0.6584, sensitivity of 0.6750, specificity of 0.6503, and AUC of 0.7564. SHAP analysis identified preoperative frailty status and baseline hemoglobin levels as primary risk drivers.
conclusionThe StackNet framework offers highly calibrated absolute risk estimates for PONV in elderly orthopedic patients. Combined with SHAP transparency, it provides a clinically actionable tool to facilitate personalized antiemetic prophylaxis while avoiding unnecessary medical interventions due to overestimated risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.