Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42082928›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2026

Caring for the caregivers: breast and cervical cancer screening among informal caregivers of cancer patients - a scoping review.

Anusree Prabhakaran, Edlin Glane Mathias, Rithu Sathiyamoorthy, Nishit Kumar Bebarta, Shirley Lewis, Arathi P Rao

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anusree PrabhakaranDepartment of Global Public Health Policy and Governance, Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Edlin Glane MathiasDepartment of Health Technology and Informatics, Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Rithu SathiyamoorthyDepartment of Global Public Health Policy and Governance, Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Nishit Kumar BebartaDepartment of Global Public Health Policy and Governance, Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Shirley LewisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Arathi P RaoDepartment of Global Public Health Policy and Governance, Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India. arathi.anil@manipal.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast and cervical cancer remain major contributors to the global morbidity and mortality among women, with early detection through screening being the key to prevention. Multiple factors influence the screening uptake, and informal caregiving for a family member with cancer may further influence their engagement in cancer screening. Evidence on breast and cervical cancer screening among women who are informal cancer caregivers remains fragmented. Hence, this scoping review aimed to identify the factors influencing and interventions that enhanced breast and cervical cancer screening, among women who are informal caregivers of cancer patients.

methodsFollowing the JBI methodology for scoping review, a comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and grey literature sources. A predefined set of inclusion and exclusion criteria was used to select the studies from across the globe. Data was extracted and narratively synthesised, with supporting tables and diagrams.

resultsNine studies from Asia, Africa, Europe and North America were included. Though some studies reported that caregiving status was linked to greater uptake of breast and cervical cancer screening, lack of knowledge and fear of cancer diagnosis hindered screening for both cancers. Breast cancer screening was higher among older, educated caregivers and female relatives (e.g., sisters), and was facilitated by positive outcome expectations, goal setting, perceived self-efficacy, and social support. Fear of cancer recurrence presented a nuanced association; moderate fear enhanced age-appropriate breast cancer screening, while higher fear led to excessive screening. Cervical cancer screening was hindered by fear of pain, social consequences, cultural beliefs, stigma, privacy concerns, limited access to screening centres, and husbands' hesitancy. A telephonic counselling by a trained nurse enhanced breast cancer screening; no interventions were found that enhanced cervical cancer screening in informal cancer caregivers, indicating a significant research gap.

conclusionMost identified factors mirrored those reported among the general female population, with limited exploration of caregiving-specific contextual factors, and caregiver-specific interventions for breast and cervical cancer screening remain scarce. Integrating physician-initiated education and counselling, and opportunistic screening during the routine clinical encounters for the cancer patient presents a promising approach to enhance breast and cervical cancer screening among informal cancer caregivers.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCaregiversEarly Detection of CancerUterine Cervical NeoplasmsFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansBreast cancerCancer screeningCervical cancerInformal caregiversSustainable development goal 3

Identifiers

PMID42082928
PMCPMC13321855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.