ArticleBMC bioinformatics2026
ShadowVIMP: permutation-based multiple testing-controlled variable selection.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIdentifying relevant biomarkers is critical in clinical research and precision medicine, particularly when analysing high-dimensional data. Random forests (RFs) are promising for such settings due to their flexibility, ease of use, and their ability to handle data sets with more variables than samples. RFs assess the importance of each variable in predicting the outcome using variable importance (VIMP) scores. However, since the distribution of VIMP scores is intricate, standard statistical testing and multiple testing adjustments for variable selection are challenging.
methodsWe propose shadowVIMP, a novel method for multiple testing-controlled variable selection, based on an approach similar to permutation testing. It generates permuted counterparts for each variable and compares their VIMPs with those of the original variables over multiple iterations to calculate p-values. Unlike conventional permutation testing, shadowVIMP preserves the correlation structure between variables, mitigating biases caused by the over-selection of correlated variables in RFs. We evaluated shadowVIMP against three competing RF variable selection approaches using simulation designs previously employed in studies considering VIMPs and variable selection for RFs. These designs included high- and low-dimensional data, as well as correlated and categorical variables. For illustration, we also applied the method to a real-world example on Alzheimer's disease.
conclusionsOur results showed that, compared to competing approaches, shadowVIMP offers advantages in high-dimensional settings, improving sensitivity while enabling multiple testing-adjusted results. Additionally, it demonstrated robustness against VIMP biases induced by correlated and categorical variables when using permutation-based VIMP. The method can be used to annotate standard VIMP plots, visually presenting selected variable sets based on different types of multiple testing adjustments and significance levels. Overall, shadowVIMP is a promising approach for providing multiple testing-adjusted variable selection while explicitly addressing known biases of RF's permutation-based VIMP measure. The shadowVIMP method is implemented in an R package shadowVIMP, which is available on CRAN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.