SynthesisClinical pharmacokinetics2026
Precision Dosing of Vancomycin: A Systematic Review of Population Pharmacokinetics Models and Comparative Evaluation of Software Tools.
Synthesis in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesVancomycin is a widely used antibiotic with a narrow therapeutic window and considerable pharmacokinetic variability, necessitating accurate and precise dosing. Population pharmacokinetics (popPK) models have become essential for facilitating model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) of vancomycin. We aimed to summarise and compare popPK models of vancomycin and evaluate MIPD software modules incorporating these models.
methodsWe systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and reference lists of relevant articles from inception through 01 January 2026 to identify articles describing the development of compartmental, one-stage parametric popPK models based on data from adult patients (aged ≥ 18 years) receiving intravenous vancomycin. We extracted and summarised key information on study design, patients, vancomycin dosing regimens, sampling strategies, quantification methods, modelling techniques, and covariates. We contacted providers of MIPD software tools and invited them to complete an online questionnaire assessing the features and clinical integration of their vancomycin module. We evaluated the incorporated models and their clinical applicability.
resultsWe identified 99 adult-applicable vancomycin popPK models across 97 articles: 48 (48.5%) were one-compartment, 47 (47.5%) two-compartment models, and 4 (4.0%) three-compartment models. Kidney function estimators and body weight metrics were the most commonly retained covariates on clearance and volume of distribution, respectively. Of 18 identified MIPD software tool providers, 13 (72.2%) completed the questionnaire, confirming the inclusion of vancomycin modules. These tools incorporated a total of 101 vancomycin models, of which 48 were intended for adults. Three tools had been evaluated in prospective non-interventional studies, and two in a prospective interventional trial. Five tools were certified as conforming to European Union (EU) regulatory standards under the Medical Devices Directive and were in the process of obtaining EU conformity under the Medical Device Regulation. Mapping published models to tool implementations revealed partial overlap, limited transparency on model selection and lack of model‑level external validation, underscoring the need for structured evaluation before routine clinical adoption.
conclusionThis review presents a comprehensive overview of vancomycin popPK models and MIPD software modules for adult patients. Our findings highlight the diversity among popPK models and the need for standardised reporting, transparent model selection, and prospective evaluation to support clinical implementation of MIPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42082885What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.