ArticleBrain structure & function2026
Emotive language activates right temporoparietal junction, while referential language activates the left hemispheric network.
Article in Brain structure & function, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Redefining language networks: connectivity beyond localised regions.Brain structure & function · 2024Article
- Neural underpinnings of processing combinatorial unstated meaning and the influence of individual cognitive style.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Language has referential and emotive uses. Referential language depicts events and can be verified or falsified by comparison with the event, whereas emotive language lacks the events upon which one can determine the truth value of the sentence. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we investigated the brain mechanisms of the processing of the two semantically distinct forms of language in a paradigm of empathy for pain conveyed through single short sentences. In the emotive condition, subjective expressions of pain, such as "I have a toothache", were used. In the referential condition, an objective description of events in which an individual would experience pain, such as "I cut my finger", were presented. Assuming each stimulus elicits activation proportional to pain intensity ratings, we combined referential and emotive conditions and performed an analysis with a parametric modulation model. It revealed activation in the anterior cingulate cortex and, slightly below the threshold, the anterior insula, that are involved in the perception of one's own pain. Without pooling the two conditions, only the referential condition yielded activation in the two regions. Crucially, although both emotive and referential language activated multiple regions, emotive sentences activated the right temporoparietal junction, whereas referential sentences activated the precuneus/retrosplenial cortex, parahippocampal cortex, and the language network in the left hemisphere. These results suggest that a complementary interhemispheric network supports the processing of both types of language.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42082884What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.