ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2026
Patient satisfaction following gender affirming facial surgery: a GENDER-Q and gender preoccupation and stability questionnaire study (GPSQ).
Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGender-affirming facial surgery (GAFS) addresses gender dysphoria by aligning facial features with gender identity, with historical emphasis on refining the upper facial third to render patients more attractive and feminine. The GENDER-Q, a novel patient-reported outcome measure (PROM), evaluates aesthetic, functional, and psychosocial outcomes, complementing the Gender Preoccupation and Stability Questionnaire (GPSQ) to assess effects of GAFS in this study. METHODOLOGY: Survey data from 86 patients was analyzed using GENDER-Q and GPSQ scores. Higher GENDER-Q scores indicated improved outcomes, whereas lower GPSQ scores reflected reduced gender dysphoria. Pre- and post-operative outcomes were compared using paired and unpaired t-tests. Spearman's correlation coefficients assessed relationships between the parameters assessed.
resultsSignificant improvements in post-operative GENDER-Q scores were observed across facial features, with upper face appearance (r = 0.54, p = 0.001), jaw (r = 0.49, p = 0.001), and chin (r = 0.48, p = 0.004), showing greatest gains. GPSQ scores decreased significantly (-7.77 ± 1.61, p < 0.001). Pre- to post-operative changes of dysphoria, as measured by the GENDER-Q were associated with overall face (r = 0.62, p < 0.001), upper face (r = 0.64, p < 0.001), and chin (r = 0.51, p = 0.08) score improvement. Furthermore, increased overall facial satisfaction strongly correlated with improvement in satisfaction with the upper face (r = 0.54, p = 0.001), jaw (r = 0.49, p = 0.001), and chin (r = 0.48, p = 0.004).
conclusionsAn individualized approach to gender-affirming facial surgery that prioritizes overall facial harmony, rather than isolated subunit changes, improves gender congruence, facial satisfaction, and alleviates gender dysphoria in transgender patients. In addition, this study advocates for the use of tailored PROMs for the transgender population to more precisely capture and quantify the impact of population-specific interventions and conditions such as gender-affirming surgery and gender dysphoria respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.