ArticleActa diabetologica2026
High-fidelity simulation-based validation of applicability of the new Italian society for pediatric endocrinology and diabetes (ISPED) recommendations for pediatric diabetic ketoacidosis management.
Article in Acta diabetologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cognitive Overload by Algorithm: Simulation Showed AI Is Not Ready to Lead Diabetic Ketoacidosis.Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo use high-fidelity simulation to validate the clinical applicability and safety of the recently updated Italian Society for Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes (ISPED) recommendations for the management of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA).
methodsExpert pediatric diabetologists participated in a full-day simulation session. Teams of four managed three advanced scenarios on a pediatric manikin: severe DKA, DKA with cerebral edema, and DKA with acute kidney injury (AKI). During the scenarios, teams utilized the new guidelines as a paper protocol, a digital application, and an AI chatbot. Each session was followed by a structured debriefing to analyze decisions, protocol adherence, and user experience, with feedback collected via questionnaires and discussion.
resultsThe simulation confirmed the overall robustness and clinical validity of the new guidelines. Participants appreciated the increased detail on managing complications like cerebral edema and AKI. A key learning point emerged regarding uncertainty in the initial choice of fluids (normal saline vs. Ringer’s lactate). A quantitative analysis of user experience revealed a statistically significant preference for the paper protocol, which outperformed digital versions on key usability metrics, including efficiency and dependability (p < 0.001). The AI chatbot, despite being rated as highly novel, was perceived as impractical and inefficient.
conclusionHigh-fidelity simulation is an effective methodology for prospectively validating and refining clinical practice guidelines in a controlled environment before official release. We confirm the validity of the new ISPED recommendations while identifying key areas for targeted training and the need for the user-centered design of digital support tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42082783What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.