Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42082780›Full record

ReviewJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2026

Structural MRI in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease: stage-dependent atrophy patterns.

Elham Khalili, Forough Sodaei, Maryam Noroozian, Tanja Maria Sheldrick-Michel, Manouchehr Seyedi Vafaee

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elham Khalili *Research unit of Psychiatry, Odense University Hospital, Clinical Research Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Forough Sodaei *Research unit of Psychiatry, Odense University Hospital, Clinical Research Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Maryam NoroozianCognitive Neurology Dementia and Neuropsychiatry Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Tanja Maria Sheldrick-MichelResearch unit of Psychiatry, Odense University Hospital, Clinical Research Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Manouchehr Seyedi VafaeeResearch unit of Psychiatry, Odense University Hospital, Clinical Research Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. mvafaee@health.sdu.dk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differentiating Alzheimer's disease (AD) from frontotemporal dementia (FTD) remains a major clinical challenge, particularly in early disease stages when phenotypic overlap is common and in later stages when cortical degeneration becomes widespread. Structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides a widely available, non-invasive framework for assessing region-specific brain atrophy patterns associated with these disorders. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on MRI-based approaches for distinguishing FTD from AD across disease stages. FTD, particularly the behavioral variant, is characterized by early and prominent degeneration of frontal and anterior temporal networks, frequently with hemispheric asymmetry and early behavioral change, including apathy as a core feature. In contrast, AD typically demonstrates a posterior-predominant pattern, with medial temporal and temporoparietal atrophy reflecting a posterior-to-anterior trajectory, while frontal involvement emerges later except in atypical variants. Quantitative MRI techniques, including voxel-based morphometry, cortical thickness analysis, and asymmetry indices, together with validated visual rating scales, enhance the detection of these spatial patterns. Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging supports interpretation by identifying vascular burden, and complementary biomarkers, including FDG-PET, cerebrospinal fluid, and blood-based markers, provide molecular and functional context in diagnostically ambiguous cases. The diagnostic specificity of frontal atrophy is greatest in early stages and decreases as AD and FTD converge anatomically in moderate to advanced disease. Accurate differential diagnosis, therefore, requires a stage-aware, integrative framework that combines structural MRI with longitudinal clinical assessment, neuropsychological profiling, and biomarker information. Structural MRI remains the cornerstone of differentiation, with regional atrophy patterns interpreted within a broader clinical and biological context rather than in isolation.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseBrainFrontotemporal DementiaMagnetic Resonance ImagingAtrophyDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansAlzheimer’s diseaseBrain atrophyDifferential diagnosisFrontal lobeFrontotemporal dementiaMagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.