Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42082763›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026

Multimodal deep learning model for multiclass classification of renal tumors.

Shiwei Luo, Quan Quan, Ruimeng Yang, Cong Li, Jiaqi Yao, Fei Tang, Yisong Wang, Kevin S Zhou, Jun Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shiwei LuoDepartment of Radiology, the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Quan QuanKey Lab of Intelligent Information Processing of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Institute of Computing Technology, Beijing, China.
Ruimeng YangDepartment of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Cong LiDepartment of Radiology, the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Jiaqi YaoImaging Center, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumuqi, Xinjiang, China.
Fei TangDepartment of Radiology, the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Yisong WangDepartment of Radiology, the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Kevin S ZhouCenter for Medical Imaging, Robotics, Analytic Computing & Learning (MIRACLE), Suzhou Institute for Advanced Research, USTC, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China. skevinzhou@ustc.edu.cn.
Jun LiuDepartment of Radiology, the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China. junliu123@csu.edu.cn.

Funding

Hunan Provincial Graduate Student Research Innovation Program CX20240305Science and Technology Innovation Program of Hunan Province 2021RC4016Scientific research program of Hunan Provincial Health Commission 202209044797
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate classification of renal masses before treatment is crucial for therapeutic decision-making and patient outcome. This study developed and validated Multi-Phase Attention Network (MPANet), a multimodal deep learning model integrating multiphase contrast-enhanced CT and clinical information, which can utilize both complete-phase and missing-phase CT data for multiclass classification of four common and easily confusable renal tumors-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC), oncocytic neoplasms (including chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC) and renal oncocytoma (RO)), and fat-poor angiomyolipoma (fpAML). A total of 1688 multi-center cases were enrolled. Across all test sets, MPANet consistently outperformed single-phase models. In the internal test set, MPANet achieved a macro-average AUC of 0.850, a micro-average AUC of 0.865, and an accuracy of 73.3%. These results compared favorably to assessments by four radiologists based on CT (accuracies 43.6-62.4%) and two radiologists using MRI with clear cell likelihood score (ccLS) system (accuracies 52.5% and 49.5%). The net improvement rate of MPANet over radiologist assessment ranged from 10.9% to 29.7%. In the two external test sets, macro-average AUCs were 0.811 and 0.813, and micro-average AUCs were 0.867 and 0.909, respectively. MPANet shows potential as a clinical decision-support tool for personalized renal tumor diagnosis.

Identifiers

PMID42082763
PMCPMC13347025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.