Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42082737›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of pediatrics2026

Oral dextrose gel vs standard care for the treatment of hypoglycemia in high-risk neonates: an open-label randomized controlled trial.

Smriti Bhargava, Shruthi Kumar Bharadwaj, Leslie Edward Lewis, Sheila Samanta Mathai, Jayashree Purkayastha

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Smriti BhargavaDepartment of Paediatrics, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Shruthi Kumar BharadwajDepartment of Neonatology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India. skb.bmc@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6737-2023
Leslie Edward LewisDepartment of Paediatrics, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Sheila Samanta MathaiDepartment of Neonatology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Jayashree PurkayasthaDepartment of Paediatrics, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.

Funding

Indian Academy of Paediatrics Indian Academy of Paediatrics Research Grant 2022 (dated 20 October 2022)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To determine whether 40% dextrose gel with oral feeds reduces NICU admission for asymptomatic hypoglycemia compared with standard care with oral feeds in at-risk neonates within 48 h of life. Secondary objectives were to assess rebound and recurrent hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, and exclusive breastfeeding at discharge and at 6 weeks. Open-label randomized controlled trial conducted at a tertiary hospital in South India between April 2023 and May 2024. Neonates born at ≥ 35 weeks of gestation with asymptomatic hypoglycemia within the first 48 h of life were randomly assigned to receive either 200 mg/kg of oral 40% dextrose gel with oral feeds or standard care with oral feeds alone. The primary outcome was NICU admission for hypoglycemia. A total of 193 neonates were enrolled, with 98 in the standard care group and 95 in the gel group. Baseline characteristics were comparable. NICU admission for hypoglycemia occurred in 4.2% in gel group and 12.2% in standard care group (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.11-1.03; p = 0.06), with a number needed to treat of 13. Exclusive breastfeeding was higher in gel group at discharge (97% vs 76%; p < 0.001) and at 6 weeks (90% vs 69%; p < 0.001). Rebound hypoglycemia, recurrent hypoglycemia, and hyperglycemia were similar between groups.

conclusionOral dextrose gel was associated with fewer NICU admissions, but the primary outcome did not reach statistical significance. Improved breastfeeding rates were observed as secondary outcomes. These findings should be interpreted cautiously and confirmed in adequately powered studies.

trial registrationClinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI/2023/02/050027). WHAT'S KNOWN: • Oral 40% dextrose gel is an eff ective fi rst-line treatment for neonatal hypoglycemia and has been shown to reduce treatment failure and intravenous glucose use in previous trials. • Existing evidence is predominantly from high-income settings, with limited randomized data from low- and middle-income countries assessing pragmatic outcomes such as NICU admission. WHAT IS NEW: • In this open-label randomized controlled trial, oral dextrose gel was associated with fewer NICU admissions for hypoglycemia (4.2% vs 12.2%) and higher exclusive breastfeeding rates at discharge and 6 weeks compared with standard care. • These fi ndings support the potential utility of dextrose gel as a simple, low-cost intervention for managing neonatal hypoglycemia in resource-limited settings.

Indexed as

GlucoseHypoglycemiaSweetening AgentsAdministration, OralBreast FeedingFemaleGelsHumansIndiaInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMaleTreatment OutcomeGelsGlucoseSweetening AgentsBreastfeedingDextrose gelHypoglycaemiaNewbornRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.