ArticleScientific reports2026
Pollution cost dynamics and regime transitions in emerging Asia: a dissipative-Logit approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emerging Asian economies, such as China, India, Indonesia, South Korea, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Thailand, face the dual challenge of rapid industrialisation and increasing exposure to environmental degradation related issues. The conventional measure of using emissions only captures the cause of environmental degradation, but it fails to account for the broader economic costs of degradation. To address this gap, the study introduces pollution cost as a measure of environmental degradation, making it a more policy-relevant indicator. To further draw nuance insights, this study employs a hybrid methodology that combines a physics-inspired dissipative model with a non-linear Logit model for panel data ranging from 2015 to 2024. This dual approach allows the identification of entropy-driven stress flows, resilience thresholds, and probabilistic regime dynamics. Results show that environmental vulnerability (EV), carbon emissions, financed emissions (FE), and disaster frequency act as stressors that significantly increase the probability of high-cost regimes. In contrast, adaptability and renewable energy penetration reduces probability by 20 to 30%, thereby associated with a reduction in the likelihood. The dissipative estimates identify an indicative resilience threshold ([Formula: see text]= -0.569), beyond which systemic costs escalate sharply. The Logit results further indicate that emissions nearly double the likelihood of high-cost regimes, while renewable adoption counters. These estimates extend beyond the obvious; the interaction effects reveal that disasters weigh in vulnerable economies, whereas financed emissions are less harmful when coupled with energy transitions. Policy takeaways emphasise the critical role of renewable energy, adaptive capacity, and green financial regulation in reducing pollution costs and securing sustainability-oriented growth in Emerging Asia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.