ArticleCommunications biology2026
The influence of nonlinear resonance on human cortical oscillations.
Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Virtual Responsive Neurostimulation Implantation: From Intracranial Connectivity to Optimized Lead Placement.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Explicitly nonlinear fMRI networks reveal hidden trajectories of infant brain development.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Spikes as perturbations of resonant neural circuits: an RLC framework with testable predictions.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Whether macroscale brain signals reflect linear or nonlinear organization remains poorly characterized. This distinction matters for modeling neural dynamics and interpreting oscillatory biomarkers of cognition and disease. Spectral analysis reveals aperiodic broadband and rhythmic narrowband components but does not capture nonlinear resonance, such as quadratic phase coupling among oscillations, which requires higher-order spectral analysis. We introduce BiSpectral EEG Component Analysis (BiSCA), combining spectral and bispectral analysis to separate aperiodic (Xi) from rhythmic (Rho) components, localize nonlinear signatures, and distinguish nonlinearity from non-Gaussianity; simulations confirm this separation. Applying BiSCA to two large datasets (1771 intracranial channels; 960 scalp EEG subjects), we detect significant nonlinear or non-Gaussian structure in 81.6% of scalp EEG and 67.9% of iEEG channels; forward modeling indicates the higher scalp prevalence reflects volume-conduction spread of focal nonlinear sources. In spatially focal iEEG, aperiodic Xi shows no detectable quadratic nonlinearity or non-Gaussianity, whereas Rho components, including Alpha and Mu, carry the dominant cortical quadratic coupling. Despite higher occipital Alpha power, the strongest nonlinear signatures arise from parietal Mu. Nonlinear resonance is thus expressed primarily through oscillatory rather than aperiodic dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.