ArticleScientific reports2026
Architecture and hyperparameter optimization of YOLOv5 and YOLOv8 for weed detection in garlic fields.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Weed adaptability to environmental conditions poses a major challenge in agricultural production, often leading to yield reduction or even complete crop loss. Effective weed detection requires algorithms tailored to the unique visual and biological characteristics of each crop. However, despite the agricultural importance of garlic, no studies have developed optimized state-of-the-art deep learning models for weed identification in garlic fields. Addressing this gap, the present study focuses on optimizing two prominent object detection frameworks-YOLOv5 and YOLOv8-for accurate weed detection under real field conditions. A dataset of 600 RGB images containing garlic plants and five weed species was collected directly from the field. Different versions of YOLOv5 and YOLOv8 were optimized and evaluated based on mAP@0.5 and inference speed. Experimental results showed that YOLOv8n achieved superior performance, yielding an mAP@0.5 of 87.0% with an average inference time of 16 ms, compared to YOLOv5m with an mAP@0.5 of 85.0% and 50 ms. The findings highlight that YOLOv8n, with an input resolution of 320 × 320 pixels and optimized using the SGD optimizer, provides the best trade-off between detection accuracy and computational efficiency. These results demonstrate the potential of YOLOv8n for real-time weed detection and its application in precision agriculture machinery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.