ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Effective monitoring of online AI decision-making algorithms in just-in-time adaptive interventions.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Monitoring just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) is important both during trialing and when the intervention is deployed in a broader healthcare program. While there is increasing interest in using artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms in JITAIs, these algorithms introduce additional complexity that requires additional monitoring. In this paper, we provide guidelines for monitoring online AI decision-making algorithms. Our guidelines include: (1) identifying potential issues, categorizing them by severity (red, yellow, and green), and (2) developing fallback methods (pre-specified procedures that are executed when an issue occurs). To make ideas concrete, we discuss algorithm monitoring systems in two case studies. In both, the monitoring systems detected real-time issues, and fallback methods both safeguarded participants and ensured quality data for post-deployment data analysis to further refine the JITAI. These guidelines and findings give teams the confidence to include online AI decision-making algorithms in JITAIs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.