ArticleCommunications medicine2026
Geometric deep learning enables high-fidelity network imputation for HIV transmission modeling.
Article in Communications medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurately mapping social and risk networks is critical for understanding and controlling infectious disease transmission, especially among hard-to-reach populations, such as people who inject drugs (PWID). Yet, empirical sociometric network ascertainment remains challenging and resource-intensive. Geometric deep learning may provide a scalable approach to inferring network structure from individual-level data, but its real-world performance and translation to epidemic modeling remain undercharacterized.
methodsWe trained a graph neural network (GNN) to predict injection partnerships from a longitudinal network study of 2512 PWID in New Delhi, India, using demographic, behavioral, and spatial injection-venue features. We compared the GNN with exponential random graph models (ERGMs), evaluated structural similarity between empirical and imputed networks, and assessed validity in an independent PWID network. To examine translational utility, we calibrated a network-based HIV transmission model on either the empirical or GNN-imputed injection network and compared HIV incidence two years after scaling interventions across venues.
resultsThe GNN achieves balanced predictive performance (accuracy 60.8%, precision 59.4%, recall 67.9%, F1 63.4%), outperforming ERGMs, and yields an imputed network with structural concordance to the empirical network (spectral similarity 0.87). Incorporating venue data increases accuracy from 51.0% to 60.8%. In the external cohort, the GNN maintains performance (F1: 61.3%) and captures structural changes. In the HIV model, calibrating on the GNN-imputed versus empirical network produces incidence curves that differ by at most 0.4 infections per 100 person-years.
conclusionsGNN-based network imputation can recover sufficient epidemiologically relevant network structure to preserve conclusions about HIV interventions, illustrating how geometric deep learning can support network-informed epidemic modeling when full sociometric ascertainment is infeasible.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.