ArticleScientific reports2026
The Suture-Action-Gaze Efficiency (SAGE) guidance framework reveals expert gaze-action coupling based on a case study of simple interrupted suturing on an artificial skin pad.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Simple interrupted suturing is a foundational surgical skill, yet the expert micro-behaviors that support efficient performance remain undercharacterized, particularly in open surgery at the level of individual stitches. This study examined expert gaze-action coupling during simple interrupted suturing and developed an empirically derived behavioral framework to translate these patterns into structured training guidance. Eight board-certified surgeons performed 335 standardized simple interrupted sutures on artificial skin while wearing Tobii Pro Glasses 3. Gaze and video streams were synchronized and segmented into stitch-level motor events. Analyses were conducted at both the stitch and subject levels using mean comparison tests and mixed-effects models. Four reproducible expert micro-behaviors were identified. First, surgeons typically directed initial fixation toward functional instrument tips rather than handles. Second, the right-to-left insertion pattern was more frequently used and was associated with shorter insertion times than the right-middle-left pattern, whereas wound-edge squeezing showed a descriptive stitch-level association that did not remain significant in mixed-effects analysis. Third, complete three-wrap knots were associated with efficient knot tying, while additional wraps and incomplete knots prolonged execution. Fourth, re-grasping efficiency was associated more strongly with technique than with needle placement location, with Gather-in-Hand and Designated Needle Placement supporting faster transitions than Slide-and-Secure. These findings were synthesized into the Suture-Action-Gaze Efficiency (SAGE) framework. SAGE should be interpreted as an observational, expert-derived behavioral guide rather than a validated causal training model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.