ArticleScientific reports2026
Coping and response patterns toward male same-sex relationships in the haredi community: A symbolic boundary analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conservative religious communities often uphold strict sexual norms that position same-sex relationships as "morally deviant" (as described by community members), yet relatively little is known about how community members construct and manage responses to same-sex relationships in everyday social life. This qualitative study examines coping and response patterns toward male same-sex relationships and gay men within the ultra-Orthodox (Haredi) community in Israel, drawing on symbolic boundary theory as an analytical framework. In-depth interviews were conducted with 25 Haredi men. Thematic analysis revealed five interrelated response patterns: silencing discourse on male same-sex relationships, framing male same-sex relationships as contradicting divine command and natural order, attributing male same-sex relationships to external secular influences, protecting the younger generation through spatial and cultural avoidance, and reparative approaches aimed at "correction." These patterns function as forms of moral, cultural, and spatial boundary work through which participants seek to preserve communal values and social order. The findings illustrate how multiple boundary strategies operate simultaneously to regulate sexuality and manage perceived normative threats amid broader social change. By focusing on community members' narratives, the study advances understanding of how symbolic boundaries surrounding male same-sex relationships are constructed and maintained in insular religious contexts, and highlights the relevance of community-level mechanisms for understanding stigma and minority stress processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.