Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42082667›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Coping and response patterns toward male same-sex relationships in the haredi community: A symbolic boundary analysis.

Sara Zalcberg, Sima Zalcberg-Block

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sara ZalcbergThe Jerusalem Multidisciplinary College, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-0354-5503
Sima Zalcberg-BlockSchool of Social Work, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel. SimaZa@Ariel.ac.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6551-1096

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conservative religious communities often uphold strict sexual norms that position same-sex relationships as "morally deviant" (as described by community members), yet relatively little is known about how community members construct and manage responses to same-sex relationships in everyday social life. This qualitative study examines coping and response patterns toward male same-sex relationships and gay men within the ultra-Orthodox (Haredi) community in Israel, drawing on symbolic boundary theory as an analytical framework. In-depth interviews were conducted with 25 Haredi men. Thematic analysis revealed five interrelated response patterns: silencing discourse on male same-sex relationships, framing male same-sex relationships as contradicting divine command and natural order, attributing male same-sex relationships to external secular influences, protecting the younger generation through spatial and cultural avoidance, and reparative approaches aimed at "correction." These patterns function as forms of moral, cultural, and spatial boundary work through which participants seek to preserve communal values and social order. The findings illustrate how multiple boundary strategies operate simultaneously to regulate sexuality and manage perceived normative threats amid broader social change. By focusing on community members' narratives, the study advances understanding of how symbolic boundaries surrounding male same-sex relationships are constructed and maintained in insular religious contexts, and highlights the relevance of community-level mechanisms for understanding stigma and minority stress processes.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalHomosexuality, MaleSexual BehaviorAdultCoping SkillsHumansIsraelMaleSocial GroupBoundary work; Religious communitiesSame-sex relationshipsSexual minoritiesSymbolic boundariesUltra-Orthodox (Haredi) community

Identifiers

PMID42082667
PMCPMC13328589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.