Articlenpj biomedical innovations2026
Diagnoses of pulmonary embolism from non-contrast 4DCT using image processing-derived quantitative perfusion scores.
Article in npj biomedical innovations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Quantitative perfusion imaging from non-contrast micro-ct for pulmonary embolism evaluation in preclinical models.Physics in medicine and biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the gold standard for pulmonary embolism (PE) diagnosis, but patients with iodinated contrast allergies or renal insufficiency are often ineligible. CT-derived perfusion (CTP) is a novel, non-contrast method to quantify pulmonary perfusion from an inhale/exhale CT image pair (4DCT). The resulting CT-P information can be used to identify hypo-perfused regions associated with PE. This pilot study introduces a thresholding approach that estimates the number of lung lobes with perfusion deficits according to optimally selected CTP thresholds. The number of lobes indicated as low-functioning provides a score to categorize patients as PE-positive, negative, or inconclusive. We trained and validated the model on a retrospective dataset of 123 suspected PE patients, achieving 72% accuracy, 75% sensitivity, and 69% specificity, with 17% of cases inconclusive. To our knowledge, this is the first PE diagnostic model from non-contrast 4DCT, showing the feasibility of non-contrast PE diagnosis strategies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.