Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42082608›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A novel diabetic retinopathy detection from fundus images using hybrid quantum convolutional neural network models.

S R Menaka, Suresh Muthusamy, Prabhjot Kaur Sidhu, Abhinandan Routray, G Uma Maheswari, Nebojsa Bacanin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

S R MenakaDepartment of Information Technology, K.S.R. College of Engineering (Autonomous), Tiruchengode, Namakkal, Tamil Nadu, India.
Suresh MuthusamyDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Kongu Engineering College (Autonomous), Perundurai, Erode, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9156-2054
Prabhjot Kaur SidhuDepartment of Information Technology, Maharaja Surajmal Institute of Technology, Affiliated to GGSIP University, Janakpuri, New Delhi, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0496-2744
Abhinandan RoutrayManipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India. abhinandan.routray@manipal.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2360-1242
G Uma MaheswariDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, RMK College of Engineering and Technology, Puduvoyal, Thiruvallur, Tamil Nadu, India.
Nebojsa BacaninFaculty of Informatics and Computing, Singidunum University, Danijelova 32, Belgrade 11000, Serbia, Danijelova 32, Belgrade 11000, Serbia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2062-924X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) diagnosis from digital fundus images is a long-standing topic of research in medical image processing. The determination of optic disk boundaries in two-dimensional retinal images is difficult due to blurred edges, which makes this field in need of improvement. All these problems cannot be solved by a single technique. An efficient algorithm for identifying DR-related retinal changes and structure is still needed. If DR is recognized and treated in a timely manner, visual deterioration can be managed or avoided. It is based on telemedicine analysis of color fundus pictures or clinical evaluations by medical doctors. However, due to intrinsic human subjectivity, both systems are time-consuming, labor-intensive, and prone to inaccuracy. Due to their great specificity and sensitivity, automated methods capable of analyzing color fundus pictures have become important for the general deployment of DR screening. To study the existence of DR-related characteristics and to cope with the various diabetes severity diagnosis phases, a hybrid quantum convolutional neural network (HQCNN) is presented. Kaggle fundus images database is utilized to test and train the network. Finally, the presented work is compared for analyzing efficiency using the system of measurement like precision, specificity, accuracy, sensitivity, and f1 score. The proposed work obtains accuracy of 98.89%, sensitivity of 99.37%, specificity of 99.57%, precision of 98.89%, and F1 score of 97.58%.

Indexed as

Diabetic RetinopathyFundus OculiImage Processing, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsConvolutional Neural NetworksHumansNeural Networks, ComputerSensitivity and SpecificityCNNDiabetic retinopathyFundus imagesImage processingQuantum computingRetina

Identifiers

PMID42082608
PMCPMC13338411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.