ArticleScientific reports2026
A multi-wavelength multi-task learning framework for risk-aware fire source classification and smoke density prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional smoke detectors suffer from high false alarm rates and lack the ability to differentiate fire sources or quantify smoke density, limiting their effectiveness in diverse indoor environments. While recent studies have explored single-task approaches for fire classification or smoke estimation, these methods typically require separate models, resulting in increased computational overhead. This study proposes a novel multi-task learning (MTL) framework that simultaneously performs fire source classification and smoke density prediction using multi-wavelength optical sensing at 460, 530, 660, and 940 nm. The system was validated under UL 268 standard fire scenarios, including smoldering fires (filter paper and wood), flaming fires (polyurethane foam), and cooking nuisance sources (hamburger patties). Among the evaluated architectures, the CNN-LSTM model achieved the best performance, with a classification accuracy of 97% and a smoke density prediction error of 0.668 MSE. Compared to single-task learning approaches, the MTL framework reduced memory usage by 45% and achieved inference times 82% faster, demonstrating its suitability for real-time edge-based fire detection systems. Ablation studies further revealed that the 940 nm near-infrared wavelength provides discriminative features for distinguishing fire smoke from representative nuisance aerosols. Overall, the proposed approach enables reliable early detection with reduced false alarms in indoor environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.