Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42082585›Full record

Articlenpj biomedical innovations2026

Symbiotic brain-machine drawing via visual brain-computer interfaces.

Gao Wang, Yingying Huang, Lars Muckli, Daniele Faccio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in npj biomedical innovations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gao WangSchool of Physics & Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Yingying HuangSchool of Physics & Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Lars MuckliSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Daniele FaccioSchool of Physics & Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. daniele.faccio@glasgow.ac.uk.

Funding

UK Research and Innovation EP/T00097X/1, EP/Y029097/1, EP/ Z533166/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are evolving from research prototypes into clinical, assistive, and performance enhancement technologies. Despite the rapid rise and promise of implantable technologies, there is a need for better and more capable wearable and non-invasive approaches whilst also minimising hardware requirements. We present a non-invasive BCI for iterative selection-based mind-drawing that infers a subject's internal visual intent through iterative selection of adaptive visual probes presented on a screen encoded at different flicker-frequencies and analyses the steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs). Gabor-inspired or machine-learned policies dynamically update the spatial placement of the visual probes on the screen to explore the image space and reconstruct simple imagined shapes within approximately two minutes or less using just single-channel EEG data. Additionally, by leveraging stable diffusion models, reconstructed mental images can be transformed into realistic and detailed visual representations. Whilst we expect that similar results might be achievable with e.g. eye-tracking techniques, our work shows that symbiotic human-AI interaction can increase BCI bit-rates by more than a factor 5x, providing a platform for future development of AI-augmented BCI.

Identifiers

PMID42082585
PMCPMC13139435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.