ArticleScientific reports2026
Early detection of mental health on social media using a hybrid Bi-LSTM-XGBoost model: a comparative study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The case of mental health disorders has been a main topic in the clinical and psychological field. The advancement of computing studies, especially in Natural Language Processing (NLP)-a subset of Machine Learning, created a system of detection that can detect the mental health state of a person in early stage to prevent the eventuality of the worst case. This is crucial since there has been a lot of case of mental health disorder-such as depression and suicide, remains undetected and untreated-especially when the internet usage is more prevalent than ever even among the most vulnerable users, which are the preadolescent users. This study explores the models that can accurately predict mental health disorder with the provided six labels the model can predict. The labels are anxiety, depression, personality disorder, stress, bipolar, and normal. The dataset is gathered from a Kaggle repository which is then processed and refined further for the training process. From multiple evaluations across diverse amount of texts from different users, our Bi-LSTM-XGBoost model outperforms the other models with an accuracy of 0.9035 and 0.4320 loss, while other models fall short within 50-84% accuracy. Further improvement can be made with our model, whether from improving the model's parameters further or by improving the quantity and quality of the dataset gathered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.