Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42082549›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Zero-shot traffic flow prediction with foundation models: a comparison with deep learning approaches.

Yue Li, Qunshan Zhao, Mingshu Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yue LiUrban Big Data Centre, School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Glasgow, 7 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow, G12 8RZ, UK.
Qunshan ZhaoUrban Big Data Centre, School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Glasgow, 7 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow, G12 8RZ, UK. Qunshan.Zhao@glasgow.ac.uk.
Mingshu WangSchool of Geographical and Earth Sciences, University of Glasgow, 7 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow, G12 8RZ, UK. Mingshu.Wang@glasgow.ac.uk.

Funding

Economic and Social Research Council ES/L011921/1Royal Society International Exchange Scheme IEC\NSFC\223042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traffic flow prediction plays an important role in managing urban transportation systems, helping to reduce congestion and improve road safety. Although existing deep learning models improve their predictive accuracy with complex architectures, they require large datasets for task-specific training. Recently, the rapidly developed foundation models have shown outstanding performance in time series prediction. Motivated by the development, we apply two foundation models, Lag-Llama and Chronos, for zero-shot traffic flow prediction and compare their accuracy with that of deep learning models. Our results show that foundation models outperform deep learning models in traffic flow prediction under both normal conditions and disruptive events. Unlike deep learning models, which require large-scale historical data and extensive training time for each task, pre-trained foundation models can be directly applied to datasets with varying data sizes, traffic dynamics, and context lengths. We also find that foundation models with longer context lengths and larger model sizes achieve higher prediction accuracy but require increased inference times. Selecting an appropriate foundation model is also crucial-models trained on a comprehensive dataset are more likely to achieve superior zero-shot performance, making them a practical and efficient choice for real-world traffic prediction applications.

Indexed as

Deep learningFoundation modelsTime-series predictionTraffic flows

Identifiers

PMID42082549
PMCPMC13328556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.