ArticleScientific reports2026
Zero-shot traffic flow prediction with foundation models: a comparison with deep learning approaches.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traffic flow prediction plays an important role in managing urban transportation systems, helping to reduce congestion and improve road safety. Although existing deep learning models improve their predictive accuracy with complex architectures, they require large datasets for task-specific training. Recently, the rapidly developed foundation models have shown outstanding performance in time series prediction. Motivated by the development, we apply two foundation models, Lag-Llama and Chronos, for zero-shot traffic flow prediction and compare their accuracy with that of deep learning models. Our results show that foundation models outperform deep learning models in traffic flow prediction under both normal conditions and disruptive events. Unlike deep learning models, which require large-scale historical data and extensive training time for each task, pre-trained foundation models can be directly applied to datasets with varying data sizes, traffic dynamics, and context lengths. We also find that foundation models with longer context lengths and larger model sizes achieve higher prediction accuracy but require increased inference times. Selecting an appropriate foundation model is also crucial-models trained on a comprehensive dataset are more likely to achieve superior zero-shot performance, making them a practical and efficient choice for real-world traffic prediction applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.