ArticleScientific reports2026
Evaluating hemoglobin versus hematocrit measurements in the diagnosis of anemia among pregnant women in Woliso town, Ethiopia: a mixed-methods study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anemia during pregnancy remains a public health concern in Ethiopia. While hemoglobin (Hb) concentration is the WHO-recommended standard for diagnosing anemia, hematocrit (Hct) continues to be used in many resource-limited areas. However, evidence comparing Hb- and Hct-based diagnostic classifications among pregnant women in Ethiopia remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the agreement between hemoglobin- and hematocrit-based diagnostic methods and to determine whether these methods yield comparable estimates of anemia among pregnant women attending antenatal care in Woliso town. A facility-based convergent mixed-methods cross-sectional study was conducted among 280 systematically selected pregnant women from February 1-28, 2023. Venous blood samples were analysed using the Mindray BC-5150 automated haematology analyser (reference standard) and the Mission Hb Hemoglobin Meter. Anemia was defined as Hb < 11 g/dL or Hct < 33%. Agreement between methods was assessed using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), Bland-Altman analysis, kappa statistics, and McNemar's test. Logistic regression analysis was performed using hemoglobin-based anemia as the primary outcome. Thirteen purposively selected anemic pregnant women participated in in-depth interviews. Qualitative data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis and integrated with quantitative findings at the interpretation stage. Hemoglobin-based assessment identified anemia in 11.4% (95% CI 8-15%) of participants, whereas hematocrit-based assessment identified 18.6% (95% CI 14-23). The 7.2 percentage-point difference was statistically significant (McNemar's p = 0.018). Agreement between Hb and Hct measurements was substantial (κ = 0.72) with excellent correlation (ICC = 0.89). However, Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated limits of agreement that may influence clinical classification near diagnostic thresholds. Factors associated with haemoglobin-based anemia included unplanned pregnancy, malaria infection, lack of nutritional counselling, and non-use of iron-folate supplementation, although some estimates were imprecise. Qualitative findings converged with quantitative results, highlighting prior illness, limited dietary diversity, and challenges with iron supplementation. Hematocrit-based assessment yielded significantly higher anemia prevalence than hemoglobin measurement, suggesting potential overestimation when Hct is used alone. While agreement between methods was substantial, they are not fully interchangeable in clinical practice. Routine use of standardized hemoglobin-based measurements is recommended to ensure accurate anemia classification among pregnant women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.