Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42082541›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Population trends in dietary patterns in Spain before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Ana Maestre, Aurora Norte, José Miguel Martínez-Sanz, José Fernández-Sáez, Ana Gutierrez-Hervas, Isabel Sospedra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ana Maestre *Nursing Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Alicante, 03690, Alicante, Spain.
Aurora Norte *Nursing Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Alicante, 03690, Alicante, Spain. aurora.norte@ua.es.
José Miguel Martínez-SanzNursing Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Alicante, 03690, Alicante, Spain.
José Fernández-SáezUnitat de Suport a la Recerca Terres de l'Ebre, Fundació Institut Universitari per a la Recerca a l'Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), 43500, Tortosa, Spain.
Ana Gutierrez-HervasNursing Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Alicante, 03690, Alicante, Spain.
Isabel Sospedra *Nursing Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Alicante, 03690, Alicante, Spain.

Funding

Cátedra Asisa Proyectos de Investigación Cátedra Asisa-2024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diet and lifestyle significantly influence health, and during periods of economic, social, or health-related instability, individuals are more likely to adopt unhealthy eating behaviours. This study aimed to evaluate changes in dietary patterns among the Spanish population during COVID-19 home lockdown, comparing them with data from the 2017 National Health Survey (NHS) and the 2020 European Health Survey in Spain (EHSS). This study is among the first to compare nationally representative data before, during, and after COVID-19 lockdown, enabling assessment of the persistence or reversibility of diet-related behavioural changes following a major public health crisis. A cross-sectional comparative analysis was conducted using food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) data from all three sources: the 2017 NHS (n = 23,089), a survey conducted during lockdown (n = 1640), and the 2020 EHSS (n = 22,072). Z-tests for independent proportions were used to compare adherence prevalence across the three cross-sectional samples, assuming normality due to the large sample size in all cohorts. The findings showed that adherence to nutritional recommendations decreased significantly during lockdown (p < 0.05), while the proportion of individuals consuming processed and highly palatable foods increased. Notably, during the lockdown, more than 97% of the population failed to meet the recommended daily intake for any of the food groups. The proportion of individuals consuming sweets, snacks, and fast food above recommended levels increased from approximately 30% before lockdown to 88% during lockdown (p < 0.05). Following the lockdown period, dietary habits largely returned to baseline levels; however, adherence to dairy (87.3% vs. 81.1%; p < 0.05) and cereals (96.8% vs. 89.2%; p < 0.05) decreased compared with 2017. In contrast, legume consumption remained high after the restriction period (76.1% vs. 86.2%; p < 0.05). Significant differences were observed between the periods before and during lockdown. Specifically, the consumption of fruits (+ 0.9%: p < 0.05), vegetables (+ 0.8%; p < 0.05), sweetened soft drinks (+ 2.6%; p < 0.05), sweets (+ 3.7%; p < 0.05), snacks (+ 0.6%; p < 0.05), and sausages/cold meats (+ 0.7%; p < 0.05) increased, whereas the intake of dairy products (- 6.2%; p < 0.05), cereals including pasta, rice, potatoes, and bread (- 7.6%; p < 0.05), meat (- 1.0%; p < 0.05), fish (- 2.1%; p < 0.05), eggs (- 2.9%; p < 0.05), and legumes (- 1.7%; p < 0.05) decreased. In line with these findings, the dietary diversity score (DDS) showed a marked reduction during lockdown compared with the pre-lockdown period, followed by a substantial increase after restrictions were lifted. These trends suggest that during crises, dietary quality tends to deteriorate. Although some dietary behaviours recovered after lockdown, the persistent decline in adherence to dairy and cereal recommendations, together with the high consumption of processed foods, highlights the need for public health interventions aimed at reinforcing dietary stability and promoting health during periods of crisis.

Indexed as

COVID-19DietFeeding BehaviorAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsQuarantineSARS-CoV-2SpainCOVID-19Dietary patternsFood consumptionLockdown

Identifiers

PMID42082541
PMCPMC13333871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.