Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42082535›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Development and field evaluation of a rapid detection method for Babesia microti using fluorescent recombinase polymerase amplification(RPA) technology.

Yuchun Cai, Han Yin Yang, Kun Qiang, Chenghang Yu, Shuning Yan, Ziran Mo, Bin Zheng, Bin Xu, Wei Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yuchun Cai *National Key Laboratory of Intelligent Tracking and Forecasting for Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Chinese Center for Tropical Diseases Research), Shanghai, 200025, China.
Han Yin Yang *National Key Laboratory of Intelligent Tracking and Forecasting for Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Chinese Center for Tropical Diseases Research), Shanghai, 200025, China.
Kun Qiang *National Key Laboratory of Intelligent Tracking and Forecasting for Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Chinese Center for Tropical Diseases Research), Shanghai, 200025, China.
Chenghang YuNational Key Laboratory of Intelligent Tracking and Forecasting for Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Chinese Center for Tropical Diseases Research), Shanghai, 200025, China.
Shuning YanNational Key Laboratory of Intelligent Tracking and Forecasting for Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Chinese Center for Tropical Diseases Research), Shanghai, 200025, China.
Ziran MoThe Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, College of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, 010000, China.
Bin ZhengNational Key Laboratory of Intelligent Tracking and Forecasting for Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Chinese Center for Tropical Diseases Research), Shanghai, 200025, China. zhengbin@nipd.chinacdc.cn.
Bin XuNational Key Laboratory of Intelligent Tracking and Forecasting for Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Chinese Center for Tropical Diseases Research), Shanghai, 200025, China. xubin@nipd.chinacdc.cn.
Wei HuThe Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, College of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, 010000, China. huw@fudan.edu.cn.

Funding

Science and Technology Leading Talent Team in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region 2022LJRC0009Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission Special Foundation 24DZ2203100the National Parasitic Resources Center, and the Ministry of Science and Technology fund NPRC-2019-194-30
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The frequent occurrences of Babesia microti (B. microti) infection have emerged as a significant global public health safety concern. The diagnosis of patients constitutes a crucial component in the prevention and control of babesiosis, necessitating the urgent establishment of efficient and accurate molecular biology diagnostic methods for B. microti detection. This study aimed to develop a sensitive, specific, and rapid fluorescent recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) technique for the detection of B. microti (B. microti) and assess its suitability for field use. This study developed and optimized a fluorescent RPA assay targeting the B. microti 18 S rRNA gene fragment. The method’s sensitivity (detection limit down to 10 fg/µL genomic DNA), specificity (distinguishing Plasmodium samples), and detection limit for spiked mouse blood samples (across varying parasitemia levels) were evaluated. The detection capability was validated using samples from an infected mouse model (tail-tip blood collected 3–21 days post-infection) and two confirmed human cases. Furthermore, 119 blood samples from patients presenting with fever accompanied by thrombocytopenia were tested using both nested PCR and the newly developed fluorescent RPA assay. The agreement between the two methods was analyzed using the Kappa value, and the significance of their difference was assessed using McNemar’s test. A fluorescent RPA assay was developed targeting two B. microti 18 S rRNA fragments (243 bp/191 bp). The 191 bp fragment demonstrated superior sensitivity (detection limit: 1 fg/µL genomic DNA) and was selected for assay establishment. Optimized at 39 °C for 20 min, its detection threshold was defined by the lowest detectable concentration (1 fg/µL). Specificity testing with 8 P. falciparum and 8 P. ovale samples showed fluorescence below this threshold. The assay achieved a detection limit of 0.046 parasites/µL blood, demonstrating a 600-fold increase in sensitivity compared to nested PCR, which detects 28.49 parasites/µL. In infected mice, both RPA and nested PCR detected parasites by day 9 post-infection (microscopy: day 15), with RPA showing higher positivity. The method confirmed infection in 2 patients. Among 119 febrile patients with thrombocytopenia from Xinyang City, Henan Province, nested PCR detected 20 B. microti-positive cases while fluorescent RPA detected 21. The Kappa value for agreement between the methods was 97.05% (91.31% − 100%), and McNemar’s test indicated no statistically significant difference in their detection rates (S = 1, P > 0.1). Based on the combined results of both tests, the molecular positivity rate for B. microti in this sample set was 17.65%, with co-infections involving Bunya virus present, accounting for 10.08% of the tested samples. The fluorescence RPA method provides a rapid, sensitive, and specific tool for detecting B. microti and is effective for field screening.

Indexed as

Babesia microtiBabesiosisNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesAnimalsDNA, ProtozoanFemaleHumansMicePolymerase Chain ReactionRapid Diagnostic TestsRecombinasesRNA, Ribosomal, 18SSensitivity and SpecificityDNA, ProtozoanRecombinasesRNA, Ribosomal, 18SBabesia microtiBabesiosisFluorescence RPA technologyRecombinase polymerase amplification

Identifiers

PMID42082535
PMCPMC13139387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.