ArticleScientific reports2026
Development and field evaluation of a rapid detection method for Babesia microti using fluorescent recombinase polymerase amplification(RPA) technology.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The frequent occurrences of Babesia microti (B. microti) infection have emerged as a significant global public health safety concern. The diagnosis of patients constitutes a crucial component in the prevention and control of babesiosis, necessitating the urgent establishment of efficient and accurate molecular biology diagnostic methods for B. microti detection. This study aimed to develop a sensitive, specific, and rapid fluorescent recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) technique for the detection of B. microti (B. microti) and assess its suitability for field use. This study developed and optimized a fluorescent RPA assay targeting the B. microti 18 S rRNA gene fragment. The method’s sensitivity (detection limit down to 10 fg/µL genomic DNA), specificity (distinguishing Plasmodium samples), and detection limit for spiked mouse blood samples (across varying parasitemia levels) were evaluated. The detection capability was validated using samples from an infected mouse model (tail-tip blood collected 3–21 days post-infection) and two confirmed human cases. Furthermore, 119 blood samples from patients presenting with fever accompanied by thrombocytopenia were tested using both nested PCR and the newly developed fluorescent RPA assay. The agreement between the two methods was analyzed using the Kappa value, and the significance of their difference was assessed using McNemar’s test. A fluorescent RPA assay was developed targeting two B. microti 18 S rRNA fragments (243 bp/191 bp). The 191 bp fragment demonstrated superior sensitivity (detection limit: 1 fg/µL genomic DNA) and was selected for assay establishment. Optimized at 39 °C for 20 min, its detection threshold was defined by the lowest detectable concentration (1 fg/µL). Specificity testing with 8 P. falciparum and 8 P. ovale samples showed fluorescence below this threshold. The assay achieved a detection limit of 0.046 parasites/µL blood, demonstrating a 600-fold increase in sensitivity compared to nested PCR, which detects 28.49 parasites/µL. In infected mice, both RPA and nested PCR detected parasites by day 9 post-infection (microscopy: day 15), with RPA showing higher positivity. The method confirmed infection in 2 patients. Among 119 febrile patients with thrombocytopenia from Xinyang City, Henan Province, nested PCR detected 20 B. microti-positive cases while fluorescent RPA detected 21. The Kappa value for agreement between the methods was 97.05% (91.31% − 100%), and McNemar’s test indicated no statistically significant difference in their detection rates (S = 1, P > 0.1). Based on the combined results of both tests, the molecular positivity rate for B. microti in this sample set was 17.65%, with co-infections involving Bunya virus present, accounting for 10.08% of the tested samples. The fluorescence RPA method provides a rapid, sensitive, and specific tool for detecting B. microti and is effective for field screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.