ArticleScientific reports2026
RBF-assisted surrogate modeling and machine learning for mechanical property prediction in friction stir additive manufacturing: Application to dissimilar AA6061/AA7075 aluminum alloys.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research develops a surrogate-assisted framework for exploring mechanical property relationships in friction stir additive manufacturing (FSAM) of dissimilar aluminum alloys (AA6061/AA7075) under data-scarcity conditions. Using a limited experimental dataset of 9 data points, Radial Basis Function (RBF) interpolation generates 882 synthetic samples covering tool rotation speed (1000–1200 rpm), traverse speed (30–40 mm/min), and tilt angle (1.0–2.2°). Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Bayesian Ridge Regression models are trained to predict ultimate tensile strength (UTS) and Vickers hardness (HV) for both 6061-over-7075 and 7075-over-6061 material stacking configurations. GPR indicates performance with mean absolute errors of 2.34–8.67 MPa for UTS and comparable accuracy for hardness, achieving R² > 0.85 across synthetic samples. SHAP-based analysis of the surrogate-trained models indicates that tool rotation speed exerts the strongest influence within the learned surrogate response surfaces, followed by traverse speed and tilt angle, with relative contributions varying across outputs. Critically, this near zero error is obtained on synthetic samples derived from RBF interpolation of the original 9 measurements, not on independent experimental data. The models effectively learn and reproduce the RBF surrogate response surface within the explored design space. The framework successfully indicates a methodology for parameter space exploration under data scarcity; however, it illustrates conceptual parameter selection workflows based on surrogate-assisted trend exploration. Independent experimental validation is required before any practical optimization. The work provides a template applicable to other data-scarce manufacturing domains, with the essential caveat that external experimental validation is a prerequisite to practical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.