ArticleNature communications2026
Impact of extreme precipitation events on facility-based births in 21 sub-Saharan African countries.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of extreme precipitation events on facility-based births in 21 sub-Saharan African countries.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Climate change impacts on health outcomes are increasingly recognized, yet the effects of Extreme Precipitation Events (EPEs) on geographical access to and timely use of health facilities for childbirth remain underexplored. We assess how EPEs influence facility-based births in 21 sub-Saharan African countries by combining Demographic and Health Survey data (2015-2021) with gridded daily precipitation data at 5 × 5 km resolution. Using a linear probability model with a three-day exposure window preceding each date of birth, we analyze 256,101 live births from 12,948 locations and define EPEs as daily rainfall exceeding the 85th percentile of the local historical distribution. We find that each additional day of EPE exposure within the three-day window reduces facility-based births by -10.8 per 1000 live births (95% CI -18.3 to -3.2), representing a 1.9% decrease from baseline. This reduction remains consistent across varying EPE definitions (50th-95th percentile) and becomes less pronounced with longer exposure windows, indicating that events closer to the birth date have greater impact. Sustained moderate to heavy rainfall over multiple days also lowers facility use, indicating that barriers can arise both suddenly and cumulatively. We estimate approximately 29,084 additional non-facility births (95% CI 8660 to 49,508) are attributable to EPEs in 2015. Our findings provide evidence that EPE exposure increases non-facility births that may lack the safety net of skilled attendance and emergency obstetric care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.