Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42082388›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026

Cell-o1 : training LLMs to solve single-cell reasoning puzzles with reinforcement learning.

Yin Fang, Qiao Jin, Guangzhi Xiong, Bowen Jin, Xianrui Zhong, Siru Ouyang, Yifan Yang, Aidong Zhang, Jiawei Han, Zhiyong Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. CellDuality: Unlocking Biological Reasoning in LLMs with Self-Supervised RLVR.... International Conference on Learning Representations · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yin FangDivision of Intramural Research, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20894, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9538-848X
Qiao JinDivision of Intramural Research, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20894, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1268-7239
Guangzhi XiongDepartment of Computer Science, University of Virginia, 351 McCormick Road, Charlottesville, VA 22904, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8049-5298
Bowen JinSiebel School of Computing and Data Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 201 N Goodwin Ave, Urbana, IL 61801, United States.
Xianrui ZhongSiebel School of Computing and Data Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 201 N Goodwin Ave, Urbana, IL 61801, United States.
Siru OuyangSiebel School of Computing and Data Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 201 N Goodwin Ave, Urbana, IL 61801, United States.
Yifan YangDivision of Intramural Research, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20894, United States.
Aidong ZhangDepartment of Computer Science, University of Virginia, 351 McCormick Road, Charlottesville, VA 22904, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9723-3246
Jiawei HanSiebel School of Computing and Data Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 201 N Goodwin Ave, Urbana, IL 61801, United States.
Zhiyong LuDivision of Intramural Research, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20894, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9998-916X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationLarge language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong general reasoning abilities, but applying them to domain-specific tasks such as analysing single-cell RNA sequencing data remains a challenge. A central task in this domain is cell type annotation, which is critical for understanding cellular heterogeneity. Although recent foundation models attempt to automate this process, they typically annotate cells independently, without considering batch-level context or providing explanatory reasoning. To address this limitation, we introduce the CellPuzzles benchmark, which reformulates cell type annotation as a batch-level reasoning task. CellPuzzles spans diverse tissues, diseases, and donor conditions, and requires reasoning across the batch-level cellular context to ensure label uniqueness.

resultsWe find that off-the-shelf LLMs struggle on this task, with the best baseline (OpenAI o1) achieving only 19.0% batch-level accuracy. To fill this gap, we propose Cell-o1, a 7B LLM trained via supervised fine-tuning on distilled reasoning traces, followed by reinforcement learning with batch-level rewards. Cell-o1 achieves state-of-the-art performance, outperforming OpenAI o1 by over 73% and generalizing well across contexts. Further analysis of training dynamics and reasoning behaviors provides insights into batch-level annotation performance and emergent expert-like reasoning. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Code and data are available at https://github.com/ncbi-nlp/cell-o1.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyLarge Language ModelsSingle-Cell AnalysisHumansReinforcement Machine Learning

Identifiers

PMID42082388
PMCPMC13198386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.