Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42082373›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in chemistry : MRC2026

Pure Gaussian Apodisation Reduces Integral Crosstalk Sensitivity in Quantitative NMR.

A Flook, C S Raman, G C Lloyd-Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in chemistry : MRC, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A FlookSchool of Chemistry, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4839-0448
C S RamanDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
G C Lloyd-JonesSchool of Chemistry, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2128-6864

Funding

Dr. Brian R. Phillips Scholarship for Chemical ResearchEPSRC EP/W007517U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences (BES) DE-SC0018047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exponential apodisation is routinely applied in quantitative NMR measurements to increase signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and integral precision, with a peak broadening effect. However, apodisation suitability is typically evaluated using SNR and peak broadening metrics and does not consider how apodisation alters peak area distribution. Here, we assess how exponential apodisation extends peak wings and relocates area away from the peak centre. This necessitates larger integral regions to account for the same area, increasing the potential for peak overlap and introducing variability in the trueness of the measurement. As an alternative, we show that a pure Gaussian apodisation can deliver comparable SNR improvements to the common exponential apodisation when tuned to a matched broadening criterion, reducing overlap of peak wings and improving robustness of finite-window integration. As a result, the narrower line width prior to apodisation can be used to guide appropriate integral region choice. Overall, a pure Gaussian apodisation is demonstrated to be a robust alternative to exponential apodisation, especially in conjunction with complex 1D NMR spectra.

Identifiers

PMID42082373
PMCPMC13432380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.