ArticleBMJ open quality2026
Closing the loop on tourniquet safety in distal radius fracture fixation surgery: a two-cycle quality improvement project.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe application of intraoperative tourniquets is a fundamental component of distal radius fracture surgery, yet it carries a risk of significant complications. The British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) has published safety guidelines (BOA Standards for Trauma (BOAST)) to standardise practice, but adherence is often suboptimal. This quality improvement project aimed to evaluate and improve compliance with these guidelines in a real-world clinical setting.
methodsA two-cycle retrospective audit was conducted at a major trauma centre in the UK. The first cycle (January to April 2023, n=34) established baseline compliance with seven key BOAST documentation standards. Following this, a multifaceted intervention was implemented, including staff education, the introduction of a standardised checklist and the placement of visual reminders in operating theatres. A re-audit was then conducted (May to June 2024, n=63) to measure the impact of these interventions.
resultsBaseline documentation compliance was extremely low, with only tourniquet pressure recorded in 20.5% (7/34) and tourniquet time documented in 55.9% (19/34). Following the interventions, documentation of tourniquet pressure increased to 59.0% (37/63) and tourniquet site, padding, compressive exsanguination, skin condition, tourniquet size and tourniquet time showed modest improvements. Overall compliance, however, remained below optimal levels.
conclusionsA targeted quality improvement initiative combining education and practical tools can lead to meaningful improvements in adherence to tourniquet safety guidelines. Despite these gains, persistent documentation gaps highlight the need for more robust, system-level solutions, such as integration into electronic health records, to ensure sustained compliance and enhance patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.