ArticleBMJ open2026
Patients before paperwork: a feasibility study evaluating digital and human scribes in psychiatric clinical settings - a randomised controlled trial protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThere are national calls for reducing physician administrative burden. While interest in digital scribes (DS) is growing, there is limited evidence evaluating their safety and effectiveness. In contrast, human scribes (HS) have demonstrated significant benefits in multiple controlled studies. To our knowledge, no prior study has compared the utility of HS versus DS in improving clinical efficiency in psychiatric clinical settings. We hypothesise that HS and DS will reduce administrative burden for psychiatrists compared with no scribes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Following institutional ethics board approvals, we will conduct a randomised controlled crossover study with 10 Manitoba psychiatrists. Study phases will include 1 month periods for baseline, HS and DS for a total of 3 months. Measures will include physician characteristics, practice patterns, administrative hours and patient satisfaction. Depending on distributional characteristics, data will be analysed using parametric or non-parametric tests to compare scribed and non-scribed periods as well as HS versus DS. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been obtained from the Committee for Harmonized Health Impact, Privacy, and Ethics Review (CHIPER) Health Research Ethics Board, which is the ethics board for medical research at the University of Manitoba (HS26944 (H2025:154)). The results of this trial will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed journal and provincial and national conference presentations. Integrated knowledge translation will be conducted throughout the duration of the research process with key stakeholders including medical organisations, such as the provincial health organisation. PROTOCOL VERSION: 1.2, 9 April 2026.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.