ArticleBMJ open2026
General practitioners and general practitioner registrars' experiences and learning from caring for dying patients: a scoping review.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe general practitioners' (GP) workforce is in crisis, with 22% of GPs feeling so stressed by the pressures of general practice they cannot cope. Patient death is the greatest stressor in medical practice and has an impact on the personal stress and well-being of doctors. Providing good holistic care for dying patients in the community keeps patients in their preferred place of care and reduces unnecessary costly interventions and hospital admissions. It is crucial to explore the experiences and learning of GP and general practitioner registrars' (GPR)-who represent the future primary care workforce-in caring for dying patients.
objectivesWe aimed to understand what is known about GPs and GPR experiences of, and learning from, caring for dying patients to outline current knowledge and identify future research options. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included all studies that explored GP and GPR experiences and learning related to adult dying, palliative, terminal care and death. SOURCES OF EVIDENCE: Four electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and Cochrane) as well as reference lists and hand-searching key journals were searched from January 2003 until February 2025. CHARTING
methodsData were extracted and charted by all authors and then a qualitative content approach was used to analyse and interpret the data.
resultsThe database search yielded 3378 publications; 17 studies have been included in the scoping review. This includes over 4412 participants, mostly GPs/GPRs. GPs/GPRs gain knowledge, skills and confidence when they have exposure and hands-on experience with dying patients. Uncertainty, intolerance of ambiguity, fear of initiating conversations around dying and perceived lack of knowledge were barriers for caring for dying patients. Facilitators such as safe learning environments with ongoing support from supervisors and protected time to discuss, debrief and reflect were valuable.
conclusionTimely understanding of the current structural, practice level factors such as learning and emotional issues and challenges is required to upskill and support doctors, which can lead to improved emotional well-being and workforce retention-all of which will directly benefit dying patients and relatives at this significant part of their lives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.