ArticleStatistics in medicine2026
Sample Size Determination for Comparing Slopes in Cluster Randomized Trials With Longitudinal Measurements.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In cluster randomized trials with longitudinal measurements (CRTLMs), clusters of subjects, rather than individual subjects, are randomly assigned to either control or intervention groups. Measurements are collected from these subjects repeatedly at prespecified times until the end of the study. In clinical research, the focus is typically on investigating trends or progress over time to evaluate the effectiveness of a new treatment or track disease progression, rather than solely analyzing mean values or endpoint measurements. For comparing slopes between two groups, we have derived closed-form sample size formulas based on the generalized estimating equation (GEE) approach under independence working correlation. Our proposed method is highly flexible, allowing for the incorporation of unbalanced randomization, arbitrary correlation structures, various missing data scenarios through observational probabilities and missing patterns, and variability in cluster sizes. This flexibility provides a practical and robust sample size solution for CRTLMs. Simulation studies demonstrate that the proposed method performs well, maintaining empirical power and type I error rate close to their nominal values. Additionally, we illustrate the application of our method using a real clinical trial, showcasing its practical utility in real-world implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.