Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42082139›Full record

ArticlePsychotherapie, Psychosomatik, medizinische Psychologie2026

[Waiting Times for Psychotherapy - A Differentiated Analysis of the Individual Treatment Phases].

Diethelm Hansen, Max Jacobi

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, medizinische Psychologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Diethelm HansenPsychologie, MSB Medical School Berlin GmbH, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6555-773X
Max JacobiZentrum für Psychiatrie, Zentrum für Psychiatrie Calw (ZfP) - Klinikum Nordschwarzwald, Calw, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Waiting times for the start of psychotherapy remain long on average. However, actual waiting times for the individual phases of the psychotherapeutic treatment process are not usually differentiated. Furthermore, distortions of the average values due to outliers are rarely taken into account. Methodology: A survey of 132 psychotherapy practices in Berlin was conducted to assess waiting times for the individual phases of psychotherapy for patients who had not yet been in contact with a psychotherapy practice. The waiting times were recorded for the period from initial inquiry to the first consultation session, from the consultation session to the first trial (probationary) session, and from the last trial session to the start of guideline-based psychotherapy. Results: The data on waiting times were all non-normally distributed. The average waiting time between inquiry and the first consultation was 4.5 weeks, but the median was only 2 weeks, with 71% of practices reporting waiting times of less than 4 weeks. The average waiting time between the consultation and the first trial session was 5.9 weeks, with a median also of just 2 weeks; 67% waited less than 4 weeks. The waiting time between the last trial session and the start of guideline-based psychotherapy was short, with a mean of 2.5 weeks and a median of only 1 week. Discussion: The relevant waiting times for patients who have not yet contacted a psychotherapy practice - from inquiry to the first consultation and from the consultation to the first trial session - are significantly shorter for many patients than the averages suggest. However, too many patients still wait more than 4 weeks in both of these phases of the treatment process.

Indexed as

PsychotherapyWaiting ListsGermanyHumansTime FactorsTreatment Delay

Identifiers

PMID42082139
PMCPMC13379281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.