Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42081826›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2026

Cultural Relevance and Acceptability of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Techniques Adapted by AI or a Human Psychologist: Experimental Study.

Youstina Demetry, Per Carlbring, Gerhard Andersson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Youstina DemetryCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm Health Care Services, Norra Stationsgatan 69, Stockholm, 113 64, Sweden, +46 739522332.ORCID 0000-0002-4864-5161
Per CarlbringDepartment of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2172-8813
Gerhard AnderssonCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm Health Care Services, Norra Stationsgatan 69, Stockholm, 113 64, Sweden, +46 739522332.ORCID 0000-0003-4753-6745

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Evidence-based psychological interventions are usually not accessed by marginalized groups such as refugees. Culturally adapted psychological interventions have reported larger effect sizes than nonadapted psychological interventions. However, the cultural adaptation of interventions is a lengthy process, entailing a challenge. One potential solution to overcome this challenge is the use of artificial intelligence (AI). Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate and compare the perceived cultural relevance and acceptability of 2 common cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) techniques when translated and culturally adapted by AI versus a human psychologist. Methods: In a 2×2 factorial design, the text generator type (AI vs human psychologist) and the CBT technique (cognitive restructuring vs behavior modification) were compared. CBT technique texts translated and culturally adapted either by AI or by a human psychologist were blindly rated using the Cultural Relevance Questionnaire and the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Raters were Arabic-speaking refugees and immigrants, aged between 18 and 69 years, residing in Sweden, Denmark, and Germany. Raters were randomly allocated to 1 of 4 conditions. Each condition consisted of 2 stimuli. Two-factor between-subject design analyses were used to analyze the data. Results: A significant main effect of the text generator domain type (P=.02; η²=0.045) was found in the first rating, with texts adapted by the AI domain perceived as more culturally relevant than those adapted by the human domain. No significant main effect of the CBT technique was found in the first rating (P=.10; η²=0.022). There were no differences in the second rating. Regarding acceptability, no significant main effects of text generator domain type (P=.09; η²=0.024) or the CBT technique (P=.88; η²=0.001) were found in either of the ratings. Conclusions: CBT technique materials adapted by AI may be perceived as similarly culturally relevant as those adapted by a human psychologist. This finding implies the potential to accelerate the cultural adaptation of psychological interventions. However, AI still needs to be used with caution and in accordance with rigorous safety standards and robust frameworks.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCognitive Behavioral TherapyPatient Acceptance of Health CareAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychologistsRefugeesSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAIartificial intelligencecognitive behavioral therapycultural adaptationethnopsychotherapyimmigrantrefugee

Identifiers

PMID42081826
PMCPMC13138788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.