ArticlePloS one2026
Community perceptions of natural supports and their approaches: A Canadian grounded theory study with Connections First.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Community-based informal reciprocal interactions (natural supports) enhance individual and community well-being. Like social connections, natural supports aim to establish supportive and healthy environments, but with a greater focus on local surroundings. This study explored natural support approaches within communities in an urban Canadian center. Employing grounded theory, purposive and theoretical sampling identified participants familiar with the community and its opportunities and activities, referred to as community champions. These champions were interviewed about their perceptions of resident connectivity and the key facilitators and barriers related to natural supports approaches in their communities. Themes and categories emerged, leading to the development of a theory. The overarching theory posited "building a community's capacity to transition from disconnected to naturally supportive: the need for connectors, assets, and action to empower residents". Community connectors and assets facilitate natural support approaches within urban community settings. Limited access to space and challenges in recruiting and retaining volunteers were identified as barriers. The findings empower knowledge users, such as community planners, to invest in and promote community natural supports approaches to enhance resident and community well-being. Future directions for this study include the implementation and evaluation of natural support approaches within communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.