ArticlePloS one2026
Increasing young people's use of sexual and reproductive health services in government health facilities in rural Kenya.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Young people in sub-Saharan Africa, especially in rural areas, face numerous daunting geographic and psychosocial barriers to accessing sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services and information. Adolescents worry that providers will be judgmental and not accord them privacy and confidentiality. They are also concerned that community members or extended family may see them waiting for SRH services, which could lead to parental perceptions of promiscuity and punishment. Because they lack comprehensive sexuality education (CSE) in schools, youths often have serious misconceptions about contraceptives. To address these barriers and increase youths' uptake of SRH services, the After-Hours Adolescent Project (AHAP) was created as a low-cost intervention for rural government health facilities. The main strategies involved extending clinic hours into early evening to be more convenient and confidential for youths, and training newly-graduated nurses to serve as AHAP nurses. AHAP was tested using a randomized cluster design in thirteen government health facilities in Western Kenya. The study examined two intervention types-the full intervention, which included having AHAP nurses conduct CSE classes in nearby schools and community locations; and a partial intervention, which was entirely clinic-based. After one year, AHAP increased young people's use of SRH services by 87% (full intervention 97%; partial intervention 77%), whereas comparison facilities saw no change. The full intervention facilities also attracted significantly more female and younger SRH clients. Additionally, improved nurse SRH attitudes after AHAP training were sustained. In sum, AHAP was acceptable and effective in rural settings, but requires ongoing budget outlays for nurse salaries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.