ArticlePloS one2026
Genetic variants and polygenic risk scores associated with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in the Japanese population.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early-stage diagnosis of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) is challenging owing to its asymptomatic nature. However, the genetic factors underlying PAF and predictive utility of polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for PAF in Asian populations remain elusive. We aimed to explore the PAF-associated genetic variants in a Japanese cohort and evaluate the predictive performance of PAF-specific PRSs. This study included 2,604 participants. Following exclusion, quality control, and genotype imputation, a genome-wide association study (GWAS) was conducted. The predictive performance of 30 sets of PRS models constructed across various thresholds was evaluated using three machine learning methods. Model performance was assessed using area under the curve (AUC) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). The GWAS using 1,038 PAF cases and 744 controls identified 82 genome-wide significant variants (P < 5 × 10-8), all on chromosome 4q25. Of these, 80 variants clustered upstream of PITX2, and two were located in LINC01438. Fine mapping identified two independent intergenic signals, with rs2200732 as the lead single-nucleotide polymorphism. The best PRS-only model achieved an AUC of >0.70, which was improved up to 0.737 in additive models incorporating both PRS and clinical variables. SHAP analysis consistently ranked PRS as the most influential predictor among the clinical variables included in this study. These results suggest that genetic risk, particularly at the established 4q25/PITX2 locus, contributes substantially to PAF susceptibility in this Japanese cohort and that PRS may improve early risk stratification when integrated with clinical risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.