ArticlePloS one2026
Interpretable miRNA-based prediction model for early detection of pancreatic cancer: Development and cross-platform validation.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPancreatic cancer remains one of the most lethal malignancies, largely due to delayed diagnosis. Although microRNA (miRNA) biomarkers show promise, many previous studies lack cross-platform validation and model interpretability, limiting clinical applicability.
methodsWe developed and externally validated an interpretable diagnostic model based on a 20-miRNA signature using publicly available datasets. A total of 801 samples were included, of which 767 were used for model training and validation. The training cohort comprised GSE59856 and GSE85589 (n = 216), and independent validation cohorts included TCGA-PAAD and GTEx pancreas (n = 585), with additional serum-based validation (GSE128508; n = 30). Feature selection and model development were conducted exclusively within the training cohort. A Random Forest classifier was applied, and model interpretability was assessed using SHAP analysis. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using cross-validation and independent external validation.
resultsThe model achieved a cross-validation AUC of 0.87 (95% CI 0.82-0.92), with sensitivity of 84.7% and specificity of 83.1% in the training cohort. External validation across independent RNA-seq and qRT-PCR datasets demonstrated AUC values ranging from 0.78 to 0.83. Performance remained broadly consistent across sample types and platforms. SHAP analysis identified miR-6875-5p, miR-196a-5p, and miR-1246 among the principal contributors to classification. Functional enrichment analysis suggested involvement in canonical cancer-related pathways.
conclusionsWe developed and externally validated an interpretable 20-miRNA signature for pancreatic cancer diagnosis with consistent performance across independent cohorts. Although based on retrospective datasets, the structured validation strategy and explainable modeling framework provide a transparent foundation for future prospective evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.