ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2026
Field deployment of a mobile suitcase laboratory for Buruli ulcer diagnosis in Ghana.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Molecular diagnostics are the gold standard laboratory confirmation test for Buruli ulcer (BU), a severe necrotising skin disease caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans (M. ulcerans). However, current molecular tests are often performed outside endemic areas, which results in delayed diagnosis and increased patient management costs. To overcome these challenges and facilitate rapid diagnosis of clinically suspected BU lesions in affected communities, we developed a portable laboratory platform contained in two Pelican cases (each measuring 56 cm × 45.5 cm × 26.5 cm). We evaluated the feasibility of performing our earlier developed M. ulcerans Recombinase Polymerase Amplification (Mu-RPA) assay, along with a rapid DNA extraction method, using this mobile suitcase laboratory at BU clinics (BU-RPA mobile laboratory) in three endemic districts of Ghana. In the field, the entire process from sample collection to DNA extraction and amplification was completed in under one hour with this mobile setup. Among 39 PCR-confirmed BU cases, 32 (82%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 67-91) were accurately identified by the BU-RPA mobile laboratory platform. All non-Buruli ulcer cases tested negative, resulting in a clinical specificity of 100% (95% CI: 90-100). Diagnostic performance varied by sample type: swabs demonstrated a sensitivity of 91%, whereas fine-needle aspirates (FNA) had a sensitivity of 69%. This mobile laboratory platform provides an effective workspace for the rapid, on-site diagnosis of BU, enabling timely results for healthcare providers at treatment centres. This mobile suitcase laboratory, together with its isothermal assays, presents a promising alternative to PCR for the swift diagnosis of suspected BU cases as well as other neglected tropical diseases in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.