ArticlePloS one2026
Association of early discharge and clinical outcomes following proctectomy for patients with rectal cancer: A NRD analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdoption of enhanced recovery pathways in proctectomy has gained attention due to its potential to reduce resource utilization and optimize recovery. Using a nationally representative cohort, we examined the association between early discharge (within 3 days) and 30-day readmissions, perioperative complications, and hospitalization costs.
methodsAdult (≥18 years) patients with rectal cancer undergoing proctectomy were identified using the 2016-2021 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Patients were classified as Early if they were discharged within 3 days of proctectomy and otherwise were classified as Routine. Multivariable regression models were developed to assess associations between early discharge and 30-day outcomes, as well as associated readmission, costs, and mortality. Entropy balancing was employed to obtain a weighted comparison to adjust for intergroup differences.
resultsOf an estimated 39,505 patients, 25.8% were discharged early. Early was younger (59 [51-68] vs 62 years [53-71], p < 0.001), had lower comorbidity burden (2 [1 -3] vs. 3 [2 -4] unit, p < 0.001), and more frequently received laparoscopic proctectomy (60.9 vs. 39.0%, p < 0.001). Following entropy balancing, early discharge was associated with lower readmission rates (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-0.86) and decreased cumulative hospitalization costs (β: - $6.2K; 95% CI, - 8.6k to -3.7k). Mortality at readmission was similar between the two groups (AOR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.33-1.45).
conclusionsEarly discharge after proctectomy is feasible for rectal cancer patients when clinically appropriate and is associated with reduced readmissions and hospitalization costs without compromising patient safety compared to routine. Broader implementation of early discharge protocols may optimize outcomes for rectal cancer patients undergoing proctectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.