ArticlePloS one2026
A lexical decision task for rapid estimation of crystalized vocabulary knowledge in Thai.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A useful distinction within cognitive and brain sciences is that between fluid and crystallized ability. Although fluid ability is widely studied, crystalized ability, which draws on acquired, declarative semantic knowledge and the mental lexicon, has been less well studied. Partly this is due to the culture and language specificity of assessment methods. We developed and assessed the psychometric properties of a simple 42-item lexical decision task that could be used with Thai speakers to assess the breadth of their crystalized vocabulary knowledge. A large sample of responses from 662 Thai-speaking participants, collected online, was used to refine the scale through exploratory factor analysis, and establish its internal consistency. A smaller sample of 90 participants was interviewed to establish validity of the task as a measure of Thai vocabulary. Large positive correlations (i.e., > .3) were found between the Thai Lexical Decision Task and measures of verbal fluency, particularly in the first 30 seconds of responding, and with other measures of Thai language skill. Temporal stability of the scale was assessed in a subsample of 27 participants. This confirmed that the Thai Lexical Decision Task has little obvious practice effect and excellent test-retest reliability. We also observed the expected positive associations with age, educational level, and self-reported proficiency in the language, supporting the ability of the task to measure acquired, crystalized knowledge. This new task could be used to estimate cognitive ability in Thai adults and shows potential as a measure of premorbid cognitive function for use in neuropsychological assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.