ArticlePloS one2026
Automated counting of prostate cell types with image processing and machine learning.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional cell counting in clinical and research settings often relies on hemocytometry, a manual technique that is labor-intensive and prone to human error. These limitations in precision and throughput can hinder the development of effective diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, particularly in the context of prostate cancer. Recent advances in machine learning have shown considerable promise in enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of cell enumeration. In this study, we present a novel software system for the automated counting of prostate cancer cells, integrating image processing with deep learning methodologies. Unique to our approach, the system robustly utilizes images acquired from conventional mobile phone cameras, offering a highly accessible and scalable solution. It applies a convolutional neural network (CNN) in conjunction with a selective search algorithm to accurately identify regions of interest (ROIs), followed by robust image analysis algorithms for precise cell detection and quantification. This two-stage pipeline addresses the inherent variability and extraneous content in mobile-captured images, which is a significant advancement over methods reliant on controlled microscopic environments. Experimental evaluations demonstrate that the proposed method achieves superior accuracy compared to conventional manual counting approaches. This automated framework offers a practical, scalable solution that may significantly improve the reliability and efficiency of cell counting in both research and clinical diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.